Honolulu, Apr 14 (AP) A key decision on where to place a USD 1.4 billion giant telescope, developed in collaboration among research institutes of India, Japan, and China, has been delayed.

The board of governors for the Thirty Meter Telescope International Observatory is still considering whether to allow construction to go forward on the targeted site, Mauna Kea, a mountain in Hawaii. An alternative location in Spain’s Canary Islands remains under consideration, the board said in a statement Friday.

“We continue to assess the ongoing situation as we work toward a decision,” said Ed Stone, the executive director of the TMT International Observatory. Mauna Kea “remains our preferred choice.” The board hasn’t provided a timeline for a decision as it plans to let legal and regulatory challenges play out on both sites.

Mauna Kea, a dormant volcano and Hawaii’s tallest mountain, was selected in July 2009 as the target location for the telescope after a five-year search. Scientists called it the best location in the world for astronomy, given a stable, dry, and cold, climate, which allows for sharp images. The atmosphere over the mountain also provides favorable conditions for astronomical measurements, according to the TMT website.

But the telescope project has been subject to years of debate — researchers say it will help usher scientific and economic developments, while opponents maintain it will hurt the environment and desecrate land considered sacred by some Native Hawaiians. Mauna Kea already houses a number of high-powered telescopes.

“Thirty years of astronomy development has resulted in adverse significant impact to the natural and cultural resources of Mauna Kea,” said Kealoha Pisciotta, president of Mauna Kea Anaina Hou, an indigenous, Native Hawaiian group that works on environmental issues.

“Trying to build more would have added to the cumulative impact.” On Thursday, the Hawaii Senate approved a bill to ban new construction atop Mauna Kea, and included a series of audits and other requirements before the ban could be lifted.

But House and Senate versions of the bill differ, so the two chambers would need to negotiate the differences in a conference committee. House leaders say they don’t have plans to advance the bill.

Democratic House Speaker Scott Saiki told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that the “bill is dead on arrival in the House.” He said laws concerning the mountain should not be passed while litigation is pending.

There are also two appeals before the Hawaii Supreme Court. One focuses on the use permit issued by the Hawaii Board of Land and Natural Resources. The other has been brought by a Native Hawaiian man who says the use of the land interferes with his right to exercise cultural practices and is thus entitled to a case hearing. (AP) UZM UZM

This is published unedited from the PTI feed.