Lawyer Appears Before Court In ‘Drunken State’, Delhi High Court Holds Guilty Of Contempt

He appeared before the court while being drunk and used "foul and abusive" language.

Published date india.com Published: August 27, 2024 7:58 PM IST
Lawyer, Court, Drunken, Delhi High Court, Delhi, Contempt of Courts Act, Metropolitan, Magistrate, Traffic, FIR

New Delhi: A lawyer has been held guilty of criminal contempt by the Delhi High Court as he appeared before a magisterial court while being drunk and using “foul and abusive” language.

Justice Prathiba M Singh, heading the bench, said, that the judicial officer presiding over the magisterial court was a woman and the manner in which the contemnor addressed her was “completely unacceptable” and appearing before a court in a drunken state was “unpardonable”. Justice Amit Sharma also comprised the bench.

“A perusal of the language used by the Respondent-Contemnor qua the Judicial Officer would leave no iota of doubt that it would fall in the definition of criminal contempt as defined under the Contempt of Courts Act. The language used by the Contemnor in fact has scandalised the Court and such conduct also leads to interference in the administration of justice. The words spoken are foul and abusive,” the bench said in a recent order.

“Appearing before a Court in a drunken state is also unpardonable. The same is contempt on the face of the Court. Thus, this Court has no doubt in holding that the Respondent is guilty of criminal contempt,” the court stated.

Add India.com as a Preferred SourceAdd India.com as a Preferred Source

The bench noted that the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (Traffic) showed that on October 30, 2015, the accused-owner of the vehicle had appeared before the court along with his lawyer, the contemnor in the present case, who started shouting during the proceedings and used abusive and filthy language.

The court stated that while it was inclined to punish the lawyer for criminal contempt, it did not award any sentence as he had already served a sentence of over 5 months following an FIR registered over his conduct.

“The period already undergone by the respondent herein is held as the punishment for the present criminal contempt,” the court said.

(With PTI inputs)

Also Read:

For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest New Delhi News on India.com.

By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts Cookies Policy.