New Delhi, July 19: The Supreme Court, on Wednesday, is all set to decide whether right to privacy of the citizens is fundamental under the Indian Constitution or not. The issue will be heard by a nine-judge bench led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) JS Khehar. The rest of the bench constitutes Justices J Chelameswar, SA Bobde, RK Agarwal, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Abhay Manohar Sapre, DY Chandrachud, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer.

The constitution of a nine-judge bench was decided by a five-judge bench during the hearings pertaining to whether Aadhaar Act violates a person’s right to privacy. Chief Justice Khehar has said on Tuesday that it is essential to determine whether there is a fundamental Right to Privacy in the Indian Constitution. “Determination of the question would essentially entail whether the decisions in MP Sharma and Kharak Singh [cases] that ‘there is no such fundamental right’ is the correct expression of the constitutional question,” he added.

Khehar also pressed on the need to first determine whether the Right to Privacy is a fundamental right or not before going into the issue. Though the hearing is expected to conclude on Wednesday itself, however, the possibility of it getting extended for another day cannot be ruled out.

The top court said the nine-judge bench will also examine the correctness of the position taken by an eight-judge bench in 1954, and subsequently by a six-judge bench in 1962. The court said both in 1954 and 1962, the benches had held that privacy is a not a fundamental right.

ALSO READ: List of Services You Need Aadhaar For in India

However, after the mid-1970s, benches of two- and three -judges had consistently taken the position that privacy is a fundamental right.

At the outset of the hearing, Justice Chelameswar said the first issue that was required to be examined is the question whether privacy was a fundamental right or just a mere right. The court was not impressed when Attorney General KK Venugopal told the bench that the right to privacy was a fundamental right under the common law, but not so in India as it is not there in the Constitution.

“It is illogical,” Justice Chelameswar said, referring to Mr Venugopal’s submission.

The issue whether privacy is a fundamental right is pivotal to the challenge to the validity of the Aadhaar programme. Various petitioners in a batch of petitions have contended that collection of personal information – like iris scan and fingerprints – under Aadhaar violated their right to privacy.

The apex court said after the nine-judge bench decides whether right to privacy was a fundamental right or not, then all matters relating to the Aadhaar scheme will go back to the original three-judge bench.

The last such hearing by a nine-judge Constitution bench took place in 2016 in which the top court had upheld the entry tax on goods entering a town or a city (octroi).

Prior to that, a nine-judge bench had in 2007 said that law falling under the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution too can be examined by the court. Before that any law included in the Ninth Schedule was immune from judicial scrutiny.

(With IANS inputs)