Ayodhya Verdict: What the Contensting Parties Want From the Supreme Court

The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha wants the Supreme Court to form a trust that will oversee the management of the Ram temple that would be built at the disputed site in Ayodhya. A Supreme Court-appointed administrator will look after the trust.

Author: India.com News Desk Edited by: Poulomi Ghosh

Updated: November 8, 2019, 11:30 PM IST

Share

Share Article

• Facebook
• WhatsApp
• X
• Email
• Telegram
• Linkedin

https://www.india.com/news/india/ayodhya-verdict-what-the-contensting-parties-want-from-the-supreme-court-3836110/ Copy

New Delhi: Several parties are involved in the decades-long Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri masjid title case. As the 40-day long hearing in the Supreme Court concluded all parties were asked to submit their written submissions. Here’s what the parties want.

Hindu Mahasabha: The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha wants the Supreme Court to form a trust that will oversee the management of the Ram temple that would be built at the disputed site in Ayodhya. A Supreme Court-appointed administrator will look after the trust.

Muslim Parties: The Muslim parties said that the verdict will impact future generations. Ther parties urged the Supreme Court to “mould the relief in a fashion that will reflect the constitutional values the great nation espouses”. there were reports of the Sunni Waqf Board withdrawing its claim for a mosque in the case, which the Board later dismissed.

Nirmohi Akhara: If the verdict is in favour of the Hindu parties, Nirmohi Akhara should get the right. The court should order the government to provide land to Muslim parties for a mosque outside the disputed area

Ram Lalla Virajman: The divine infant, Ram Lalla Virajman, said the right to the land should not go to the Nirmohi Akhara or the Muslim Parties.