New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will hear pleas filed against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) only after the pan India violence over the legislation stops. Also Read - Supreme Court Orders Inquiry Into Telangana Encounter: 'Not Implying You Are Guilty,' Says CJI SA Bobde

A bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde said there is already so much violence involved in the protests. He observed that at a time when the country is already going through difficult times, the endeavour should be to restore peace. Taking such petitions in the matter without improved circumstance does not help the cause, he noted. Also Read - 'Justice Loses Its Character if it Becomes Revenge', Says CJI SA Bobde

The bench also comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant made the observation on the mentioning of a petition filed by an advocate Vineet Dhanda seeking the listing of his plea to declare CAA constitutional and also direction from the court to all states to implement it. Also Read - SA Bobde Succeeds Ranjan Gogoi, Becomes 47th Chief Justice of India

Dhanda moved the apex court to defend the constitutionality of CAA, and also sought action against activists, students, media houses spreading “false rumours”.

The court, putting a query to the lawyer, said: “Who wants CAA to be declared ‘constitutional’, and how can this court declare that an Act passed by the Parliament is constitutional?”

The court observed that there is always “a presumption of constitutionality, and being a student of law, you should know”.

The court also observed that it was unusual to hear somebody seeking a declaration from the court that an Act is constitutional.

The bench said that the job of the court is to determine the validity of a law and it is not its job to declare it constitutional.

(With IANS inputs)