New Delhi: The Supreme Court bench of justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan, which was expected to demarcate lines of power to both the Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor on Thursday, has delivered a split verdict on the jurisdiction of Centre or Delhi government over appointment and transfer of bureaucrats. Also Read - Delhi CM Kejriwal Still Has Full Z Plus Security Cover: Centre on AAP's Claim

Justice AK Sikri today held that the transfers or postings of Joint Secretary and officers above are in the domain of the latter, while other officers fall under Delhi government. However, in case of difference of opinion, view of L-G will prevail. He also added that the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) will come under the L-G, since the Delhi government has no authority over the police force. Also Read - UPSC Exam 2021: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Of Last Attempt Civil Service Candidates

However, Justice Ashok Bhushan dissented from Justice Sikri on the issue of ‘Services‘ and said that all the officers fall under the domain of the Central government, hereby leaving the power tussle pertaining to the bureaucracy in a limbo. Also Read - Mukesh Ambani's $3.4 Billion Deal With Future Group Stalled After Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Amazon Plea

The Supreme Court bench has referred the issue to a larger bench to decide whether the Delhi government or Lieutenant Governor should have jurisdiction over ‘Services’ in Delhi.

Reportedly, the right to set up Commission of Inquiry will rest with the L-G, while the Electricity Board will come under the Delhi government.

The Supreme Court today pronounced its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging notifications issued by the Arvind Kejriwal government in Delhi amid a power tussle with the Centre. The Supreme Court bench started to read their verdict at 10:30 AM on nine petitions that were filed before the court in connection with the dispute. The hearing had concluded on November 1, 2018.

The apex court ruled upon issues like the power to set up commission of inquiry and also who commands authority over the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB).


The Arvind Kejriwal-led Delhi government had long been at loggerheads with Delhi Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal and  his predecessor Najeeb Jung over who holds the power strings in the national capital.

The Aam Aadmi Party maintained that it has had little to no say in the capital’s governance, despite being voted to power by a clear mandate.

The Supreme Court, in its earlier order in July 2018, had ruled that Delhi cannot be granted statehood, as sought by the incumbent AAP government, but the Lieutenant-Governor has no “independent decision-making power” and must act on the “aid and advice” of the elected government.

However, this verdict overturned an August 2016 high court judgment which contended that Delhi was a Union territory and all its powers lie with the Centre and not the city government.

The Supreme Court then refused to elaborate on specific areas – that lead to further confusion over the interpretation of its verdict.

Following this, both Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal knocked the doors of the court again, seeking “more clarity”.