Chicago, Jan 26 (AFP) Citing mounting evidence from recent US executions, a federal judge today blocked the use of lethal injections to put to death three inmates, saying a proposed cocktail of drugs was unconstitutional.Also Read - US President Joe Biden Plan Seeks to Expand Education, From Pre-K to College
Federal Magistrate Judge Michael Merz of Ohio focused heavily on the use of one of the drugs, midazolam, citing evidence from multiple other state executions that the drug insufficiently sedated inmates, likely leading to suffering during their executions. Also Read - US Has Enough COVID-19 Vaccines For Boosters, Kid's Shots
Lawyers for three Ohio death row inmates claimed such suffering violated the US Constitution’s Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Judge Merz sided with that argument, saying the proposed three-drug lethal injection cocktail “creates a substantial risk of serious harms.” Also Read - PM Modi Clocks 20 Meetings in His 65-hour Stay in US
Raymond Tibbetts, Ronald Phillips and Gary Otte were all scheduled to be executed by Ohio between February and April, but Merz granted a preliminary injunction barring the state from using a combination of midazolam, a paralytic agent or potassium chloride, which stops the heart.
In a 119-page ruling, the judge cited recent executions in Ohio, Alabama, Arizona and elsewhere, where inmates receiving midazolam as the first drug in a lethal injection cocktail appeared to remain conscious for a substantial period of time.
Ohio halted executions after the 2014 lethal injection of Dennis McGuire using midazolam, during which the inmate appeared to snort and gasp. Judge Merz pointed to witness testimony from that execution, including from Columbus Dispatch reporter Alan Johnson, who has witnessed 20 executions in total.
“McGuire began coughing, gasping, choking in a way that I had not seen before at any execution… Frankly, that went on for 12 to 13 minutes,” the judge quoted Johnson as saying.
The state countered that the revised dosage of midazolam would be 50 times stronger. But the judge pointed to expert testimony offered by the plaintiffs that midazolam was not an adequate substitute for general anesthesia drugs.
Its use in executions is “contrary to sound medical or scientific reasoning,” testified Craig Stevens, professor of pharmacology at Oklahoma State University, according to the court.
States have struggled to find adequate supplies of lethal injection drugs, as pharmaceutical companies have restricted the use of their drugs for executions.
Court challenges have ensued as states have tried new drug cocktails. (AFP)
This is published unedited from the PTI feed.