Mumbai: The United States is not going to put pressure on India to buy F-16 fighter jets or any other defence system, said reports on Monday. PTI quoted US Consul General in Mumbai Edgard Kagan as saying that India had purchased more than USD 15 billion worth of American defence materials and the US was “very proud” of the expanding defence ties between the two countries.

While evading a direct answer on the threat of the US imposing trade sanctions on India after its multi-billion deal with Russia for the S-400 air-defence system, Kagan said, “The idea that the US is going to pressure India to buy the F-16 or any other system is not true. We believe that American military systems bring tremendous capability to India or any other country which buys that. But we recognise that India makes its decisions on its own grounds.”

Kagan said it was important to recognise that decisions have consequences and India was aware where the US stood on a variety of issues. India concluded a USD 5 billion deal to buy the S-400 air defence missile system from Russia which could attract US sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA). American lawmakers, however, have allowed the possibility of a presidential waiver.

“The fact is that India has purchased over USD 15 billion worth of American defence materials and there hasn’t been one hint of a scandal. There hasn’t been one suggestion of any impropriety and that’s very significant. The American defence procurement is transparent… All details are published on the US site,” he said.

“When you compare the track record of the C-17 purchases for instance, or C-130 purchases, which were all done on budget, on time and in a very transparent way without a single hint of impropriety with many other defence procurement, the difference is quite striking,” he said. The C-17 and the C-130 are US-made cargo aircraft.

Asked about the Indian government directing social media platforms to take concrete steps to check the spread of rumours and messages inciting unrest, cyber crimes and other activities that could jeopardise national security, he said putting restrictions is no solution. “I would be very concerned trying to restrict speech either on social media or anywhere else. The challenge is only to make sure that you understand the consequences of their actions.