India head coach Ravi Shastri has urged protesters to be patient amid widespread outrage over the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). Shastri feels that there are “plenty of positives” coming out of the controversial law in the long run. Also Read - India vs England, 3rd Test: The Top Facts About Motera Stadium

The 57-year-old Shastri, a former batsman, said he is confident that the government has thought through the decision to introduce the law. Also Read - Ladakh Standoff: What India, China Discussed During 16-Hour Long Military-Level Talks | Read Here

“When I see all this CAA and things going around it, I think Indian. In my team also, we have all sorts, different castes, different religions whatever but Indian. I say guys, be patient because I can see plenty of positives coming out of it in long run,” Shastri told ‘CNN News18′ but did not elaborate any further. Also Read - Ladakh Standoff: India-China Hold 10th Round of Military Talks For Further Disengagement | What to Expect

“I am sure the government has thought about it properly. There are still certain things to be tweaked here and there and they will do it for the benefit of Indians. I am speaking as an Indian here.

“I am not talking about x, y, z religion because I am speaking as an Indian. That’s who I have been, I realised it even more when I played for the country. So, I have the right to speak as an Indian,” he asserted.

The CAA, which seeks to provide citizenship to non-Muslim religious minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, is facing stiff opposition with protests in several parts of the country.

The amended citizenship act seeks to provide Indian citizenship to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis, and Christians who fled from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan before December 2014 due to “religious persecution or fear of religious persecution”.

The act has met with fierce opposition and protests have raged across the country ever since it was passed in December last year.

The protests in the northeastern states have been driven by the sentiment that the move will affect the locals’ “political rights, culture and land rights” in the region. Several other quarters in the country are opposing it for being “anti-Muslim”.