Prashant Bhushan is a prominent civil rights lawyer in the Supreme Court of India and an activist. He is one of the founding members of the Indian political party Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), and a member of a team of India Against Corruption (IAC) movement which supported Anna Hazare's campaign for the implementation of the Jan Lokpal Bill.
Prashant parted ways with the AAP in 2015 after he had a fall-out with leader of the party Arvind Kejriwal over his deviation from the core ideology, values and commitments. In 2016, he was one of the founders of Swaraj Abhiyan and Sambhaavnaa, an Institute of Public Policy and Politics.
ACTIVISM:
Influenced by his father, Prashant was drawn to public activism with his main areas of interest being human rights, environmental protection and accountability of the public servants. He is associated with organisations like the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), and Transparency International (India).
In 1990, Prashant and his father formed the Committee on Judicial Accountability (CJA) to fight corruption in the judiciary, and the organisation comprised of some lawyers and ex-judges. In 2007, the Bhushans expanded CJA to include citizens and formed the Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform (CJAR).
Prashant, who published a book in 1990 titled Bofors: The Selling of a Nation, also pushed for government accountability, and in 2003, CPIL won a major victory when the Supreme Court restrained the Union government from privatising Hindustan Petroleum and Bharat Petroleum without the approval of Parliament. He also represented the CPIL in a petition asking for the removal of Neera Yadav from office as Chief Secretary of Uttar Pradesh for alleged corruption, which the Supreme Court directed the Mulayam Singh state government to do so in 2005.
2006 TO 2012:
In 2006, Prashant represented the CPIL in a petition alleging that Pepsico and Coca-Cola were failing to warn the public of harmful ingredients in their beverages.
In March 2011, SC struck down the appointment of PJ Thomas as Central Vigilance Commissioner after Prashant filed a PIL challenging the appointment after Thomas was named in the Palmolein Oil Import Scam.
Prashant also acted for the CPIL when it took the lead in filing a suit against the Government of India for irregularities in a major award of spectrum for 2G mobile telephones.
In 2012, Prashant filed a PIL seeking cancelation of coal block allocations by the government on the grounds that certain companies had been illegally favoured by the politicians.
Prashant also filed a PIL against illegal iron ore extraction in Goa, which led to the Supreme Court halting all the mining operations in the state.
OTHERS:
Prashant has taken a stand against many policies of the government, like the use of violence against the Naxal insurgents in the tribal-dominated areas and the death penalty.
In 1990, he successfully got the criminal liability aspect in the Bhopal gas tragedy reopened by SC, by challenging the settlement in the case of compensation to the victims.
He assisted the Narmada Bachao Andolan activists who were opposed to the Sardar Sarovar Dam, and opposed the Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement, supporting the People's Movement Against Nuclear Energy stand against establishment of the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant.
PERSONAL LIFE:
Prashant Bhushan was born on October 15, 1956 in New Delhi to Shanti Bhushan and Kumud Bhushan and he has three siblings. He had attended IIT Madras and Princeton University briefly and has a law degree from Allahabad University. Apart from Bofors: The Selling of a Nation, he also published a book titled The Case that Shook India while still a student. He is married to Deepa Bhushan, a former lawyer, and has three children with her.
SOCIAL:
Prashant Bhushan updates followers through Facebook - @PrashantBhushanOfficial, Twitter - @pbhushan1, and Instagram - @prashantbhushan_.
Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) filed a contempt petition in the Supreme Court accusing the State Bank of India of failing to provide the Election Commission with information regarding electoral bonds.
The top law officer was appearing before a bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar to assist it in the hearing of the 2009 contempt case against activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan and journalist Tarun Tejpal.
Bhushan, who had accepted the fine against the imprisonment of three months for his dissenting tweets against Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, had asserted that he did not accept the verdict.
"Just because I'm paying the fine does not mean I have accepted the verdict. We have filed a writ petition that there must be an appeal procedure created for conviction under contempt," Bhushan said.
Soon after the verdict, Prashant Bhushan was photographed holding up a Re 1 coin, the images of which have gone viral, triggering a barrage of memes on Twitter
On August 25, a bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari reserved the verdict after a detailed hearing on the matter. On Bhushan's refusal to apologise, the court asked, "What is wrong in apologising? Is this word so bad?"
Earlier today, Attorney General KK Venugopal told the top court that he should be pardoned "with a warning" as he sought forgiveness for the activist-lawyer.
Prashant Bhushan had refused to apologise in his supplementary reply before the apex court. "I believe that the Supreme Court is the last bastion of hope for protection of fundamental rights," he said.
On Thursday, the Court had rejected Prashant's plea to defer the hearing on his sentence till his review petition against conviction for criminal contempt is filed and decided. "Even if we punish you, it won't be activated, till the decision on review. We'll be fair to you. We feel you are trying to avoid this bench," the Court had maintained.
The lawyer-turned-activist, held guilty of contempt over a tweet regarding CJIs, told the Supreme Court that he was "pained" at the court's decision as he has been "grossly misunderstood".
"I do not ask for mercy. I do not appeal for magnanimity. I cheerfully submit to any punishment that court may impose", Bhushan said quoting Mahatma Gandhi.
The SC in November 2009, had issued a contempt notice to Bhushan and Tejpal for allegedly casting aspersions on some sitting and former top court judges in an interview to news magazine Tehelka.
Senior advocate Shanti Bhushan, who is an intervener in the case, said he found it very difficult to advance arguments through video conferencing and it would be better if the case was heard after normal hearing begins.
Noting that the issue is much larger, the Bench asked the Attorney General about the law regarding media discussions on matters that are pending before the Court.
In 2017, Goel said to then CJI Justice J.S. Khera of the several complaints against Kant including those property-related cases after Kant was appointed as the judge.
The bench, which also comprised Justices S K Kaul and K M Joseph, asked Bhushan to provide details and said it would consider granting urgent hearing on the petition.
Don’t Miss Out on the Latest Updates. Subscribe to Our Newsletter Today!
Subscribe Now
Enroll for our free updates
Thank you
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts Cookies Policy.